The NCAA has been granted a stay in the Wisne vs. NCAA lawsuit, which means that many players in the Class of 2022 are now deemed ineligible unless they have secured temporary restraining orders. This comes following a Colorado judge's earlier ruling that allowed some athletes to claim a fifth year of eligibility. Despite some recent successes in securing restraining orders, such as high-profile athletes like Jack Pyburn, this decision will likely incite further legal actions from others in the class as they seek eligibility before the NFL season starts.

By the Numbers
  • 16 athletes, including Jack Pyburn, have received temporary restraining orders, allowing them to return to college football.
  • Over 20 players are expected to pursue legal action to secure fifth-year eligibility following this ruling.
Yes, But

While the NCAA's stay is a notable victory, the ongoing legal landscape is complicated by the increasing number of athletes seeking to challenge their ineligibility. This could lead to a protracted series of lawsuits that may impact NCAA policies moving forward.

State of Play
  • The NFL regular season is approaching, with roster cut-down day on Aug. 30.
  • Many rookie players currently facing cuts might consider returning to college football as a viable option.
What's Next

As the deadline for NFL cuts nears, expect a surge of athletes exploring legal options to secure their eligibility for another college season. The landscape could shift rapidly if significant numbers of players pursue restraining orders.

Bottom Line

The current NCAA ruling may bolster its position temporarily, but it is likely to provoke further litigation from athletes. Continued scrutiny and legal challenges could redefine eligibility standards and involvement in college sports, setting a precedent for future classes.